Ben Koyack  6' 5" 228lbs. TE 2011

Koyack certainly seems to fit the part of a tight end and even his name sounds like the name of a good tight end. It takes more then a name though and this kid seems to have the tools also. He has good size and height and on film he displays the frame to be able to pack on plenty of more good size with time in a college weight program. He is productive in the passing game. He has good hands and is able to extend his arms and catch the ball away from his body. One of his real strengths is his ability to go up and compete for the ball. He will consistently high point the ball and with his size he can be a touch match-up for smaller defenders. He displays good concentration to

catch the ball in a crowd. Also shows good body control and awareness of where he is on the field and is able to make catches along the sideline and stay in bounds. He has good and you could even say a bit of deceptive straight-line speed. He could stretch the field, but does not seem to have very long strides and may not present the same type of vertical threat at the college level. He is tough after the catch and will break arm tackles. He is also a productive blocker. Displays the ability to get hands on and move his feet and be able to create some push. Flashes the ability to get his hips under him and create some power when drive blocking. Flashes the ability to get hands on and move his feet and be able to seal on the edge. Does a solid job of getting up to second level and getting a piece of moving targets. Displays the tools and size potential to be a productive in-line blocker, but needs to work on consistency. Koyack is a good tight end prospect with the size and tools to be a productive well rounded college tight end. . . ..........................        Intangibles                        9 ...    Athleticism                        8      Size                        9   ...  Strength                        8      Quickness                        7      Blocking                        8      Speed                        7      Cut back                        7      Potential                         9      Technique                         8 Overall score   80

. .